新手上路
- 积分
- 1
- 威望
- 388 点
- 金钱
- 0 £
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-11
|
) N! j- J1 g% o
( E$ y1 a; x$ A; ^无穷 | Without End 有些人认为,佛教中说一切众生皆作过自己父母之理,既不现实也不可能,且不论是否有
7 m. n$ e" ^8 ^8 w前世,即使有,但世间众生如此之多,如此之喻如何得以穷尽?
8 c! A3 ]7 f' @2 E7 g; ?The Buddha says all sentient beings have previously been our own mothers and fathers. Many( M; c. ^# T* j* u
people find this teaching improbable and impossible. Putting aside the argument about the
+ H* K& o5 ~$ m; L& m Pexistence of past lives, even if it were true, how could we ever exhaust all sentient beings, as1 y# \! l( U+ v- C1 u
their number is simply innumerable?
; S5 O0 q) m# j$ S; R然而,以一般世间人的眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意来衡量之结果并非正量。《三昧王经》云
9 L9 t3 k$ s2 M$ P! z1 ]:“眼耳鼻非量,舌身意亦非,若彼等为量,圣道复益谁?”) ^8 W. Y$ K1 `/ a. |
However, the conclusions reached by the ordinary sense faculties—our eye, ear, nose, tongue,
2 U4 y0 }, C }/ {- n9 vbody, and consciousness—are not valid in the ultimate sense. The King of Concentration Sutra1 Y0 l5 a) D& F( j/ @1 d
says:" f# b0 v! y6 A# g. }$ _
Eyes, ears, and nose are not valid instruments of discernment,
# X. |- h5 q3 d6 A. FNor are tongue, body, and consciousness reliable.
4 A/ L6 m/ u( r8 t0 n2 G GShould their perceptions be true,
* t0 |8 i7 e5 O# N1 wWhom should the holy Doctrines benefit?
' P0 l7 Q$ O& D0 y& S) @只有究竟之智慧,方可照见世间万事万物之本性。若未依甚深佛智,仅依凡夫之分别念,. G& Z" `- Z; s
实难彻见纷纭繁杂的现有表象之本质。! \/ \, O, W- p4 r: s
9 I! ]1 Q2 W5 u5 _It is only with supreme wisdom that the true nature of all phenomena will be revealed. Without
4 e6 q9 g/ v1 W4 s+ C( W+ s% M! f& mrelying on Buddha’s profound insight, no amount of ordinary conceptual thinking is able to
8 \6 y( X& L& `3 N# qdiscern the essence of myriad appearances.
* f* m/ \3 H; l, N' U( l6 `无始的概念,一般凡夫的六根是很难揣度的。《亲友书》云:“过去一一生身骨,辗转积若2 K, |) q' |8 j9 {
妙高山,地土丸为酸枣核,数己形躯岂尽边。”无始以来,每一众生流转轮回的次数,世间
7 y& {; I) r9 Z5 g/ w的数字是无法表示的。为业力所转而互为亲怨的数字也同样难记其数。《圣者涅槃经》中/ k) h" l- W& K' i3 \/ I
云:“此大地土抟成豌豆许丸用以衡量一有情为自父母之数,则可数尽,然一有情为自父母
, P4 D; `# I& D9 H0 g* h之数却不可胜数。”8 _& {3 F, p8 Z
Likewise, the notion of time without beginning is difficult to grasp using the six faculties of& p3 V0 [3 N+ Y, C
ordinary being. In Letter to a Friend, The sublime Nagarjuna says: “Should the bones we had, U5 q/ z4 V4 m4 z: L; p
through our past lives be piled up, they would be as high as Mt. Meru. Should we try to count our
% V+ G, Q2 ^" p. g) ubodies with balls of clay the size of juniper berries, we would run out of earth to count.” Since
' H4 S7 Z9 }; [5 e8 c1 ~7 ybeginning-less time we have had incalculable lives throughout samsara, the number of times that
9 W6 J L) g5 L' l3 }+ v) Ywe had relations of affection, enmity, or indifference with every other being is also countless.
4 l" d3 \. P& l3 ~1 J7 }6 v2 ~8 c8 P5 UThe Sages’ Nirvana Sutra says: “Were this great earth made into little pellets as big as a pea to: S/ O' W# X# P% g* N
count the number of times someone had been my father and mother, the whole earth would be3 q" z5 l* f; G. I3 S
used up before I could finish counting.”
$ L# c, O7 H" n+ r' ^所以,在未对佛经进行精读、思维前,切不可对佛教之说法妄加评论。对经论进行精研以
5 Y! V( h) {, d后再下结论乃为智者之所为。" x- F. T2 F5 k. T
Hence, until we have thoroughly studied and reflected upon the Buddha’s teachings, we should
5 E# I) c* e+ Odefinitely refrain from making reckless remarks. A wise man will choose not to draw any
' ~9 E9 w# H1 M% kconclusion until he has carefully reviewed the sutras and shastras.: b) e, ?; K5 Z- q9 E
壬午年二月十六日 : O* c9 k* h. |6 \' q7 Q
2002年3月29日
* |) X }$ @! q( i4 h; A16th of February, Year of RenWu8 Z- W8 Y" w+ W; e; j. n" l
March 29, 2002" d& M0 l6 u9 i- Z' M/ ^& c3 q
|
|