联邦留学辅导
鸣挚海外家政服务
代购代带网
人口普查
买书

英国伦敦华人网 - 英国伦敦第一中文门户网站

 找回密码
 注册

扫一扫,访问微社区

Proposed revisions of 44 Chinese characters spark controversy

2009-8-22 13:40| 发布者: Andy| 查看: 114| 评论: 0|原作者: Li Xianzhi|来自: Internet

BEIJING, Aug. 22 -- A proposal of the Education Ministry to

readjust the font of 44 Chinese characters has triggered controversy in the

country on whether the traditional way of writing should be altered.

After eight years of efforts, the Education Ministry unveiled a list of

8,300 standardized Chinese characters in common usage to solicit public opinion

10 days ago in hopes to regulate the way of characters writing.

Ministry officials and some experts said the revisions would only target 44

characters printed in the Song typeface on publications, in other words, the

revised characters would only be used by computers and printing machines.

But they soon gave rise to disputes and as the public suddenly found the

characters look different from what they used to be, which means they have to

change their former way of identifying them.

An online survey conducted by major Internet portal Sina.com showed 90.2

percent of more than 340,000 respondents opposed the revisions as of Saturday,

while only 5.1 percent voted for them.

"The characters printed in our textbooks adopt the Kai typeface, and we

don't need any change. But students would be easily confused by the revised

characters on other publications," said Wang Jiayu, a Chinese language teacher

at a primary school in south China's Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region.

Many of the 44 characters are used frequently, which would undoubtedly pose

challenges to people's habits of reading and writing, she said.

"The change is only a slight change of one stroke for a character, but if a

pupil asks me which one of the same character is correctly written, I don't know

how to reply," she said. "There will be much confusion if different ways of

writing the same character exists, especially for children."

To Tang Yunlai, chairman of the Tianjin Municipal Calligraphers'

Association, it is needless to make such revisions.

"The way of writing characters should better remain in a stable state

within a long period of time," he said.

Objections also emerged as the costs of the revisions would be huge.

"The revisions of the 44 characters would lead to amendments on books,

dictionaries, signboards, company names, ID cards and others," said Prof. Wang

Laihua, of the Tianjin Municipal Academy of Social Sciences. "That will cost

lots of money and time."

As a syllabic and ideographic writing, the Chinese written history is 3,400

years old -- one of the oldest languages in the world.

Today, there is two ways of writing Chinese characters: traditional Chinese

characters that usually contain many strokes are still in use in Hong Kong,

Macao and Taiwan; and simplified Chinese characters that are used on the Chinese

mainland since the People's Republic of China was founded.

"The readjustment is made against the backdrop of the information age and

for the sake of facilitating information storage, management and exchange," said

Li Yuming, deputy director of the State Language Work Committee.

"Slight amendments will not affect the lives of ordinary people, and it

will do good to the standardization of the printing," he said.

Experts revised the characters while taking into consideration the

calligraphy of traditional Chinese, such as those still in use in Taiwan, said

Prof. Wang Ning, of the Beijing Normal University.

"Minute changes would not affect people's habits of reading. The 44

characters account for no more than six per thousand of the total in the list,

so it would not force the public to learn all the Chinese characters again,"

said Wang, also one of the experts who attended the revision work.

"Whether to make a readjustment for a character does not depend on the

votes, but on whether it is reasonable to do so," she said.

"Of course, we are not against the public. We are listening to the public

sincerely," she added.

The solicitation of opinions will end on Aug. 31.

最新评论

广告合作(Contact Us)|关于我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|伦敦华人网

GMT, 2024-11-22 16:47

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

返回顶部